Toxic Release Inventory data for 2024. 10 facilities reported releasing dimethylamine dicamba.
| Facility | State | On-site (lb) |
|---|---|---|
| Albaugh Inc. Saint Joseph | Missouri | 1.1k |
| Chemsico Saint Louis | Missouri | 255 |
| Nufarm Americas Inc (Dba Riverdale Chemical) Chicago Heights | Illinois | 35 |
| Makhteshim Agan Of N.a. Inc Dba Adama Vernon Wareh Tifton | Georgia | 10 |
| Makhteshim Agan Of N.a. Inc. Dba Adama Tifton Plan Tifton | Georgia | 10 |
| Nufarm Americas Inc - Greenville Greenville | Mississippi | 9 |
| Heritage Thermal Services East Liverpool | Ohio | 0 |
| Pbi/Gordon Corp Kansas City | Kansas | 0 |
| Eau Claire Co-Operative Oil Co Eau Claire | Wisconsin | 0 |
| Scotts Co Fort Madison Iowa Fort Madison | Iowa | 0 |
The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) tracks how much of each listed chemical U.S. industrial facilities release into the environment each year. EPA requires facilities in certain industry sectors that manufacture, process, or otherwise use TRI-listed chemicals above threshold amounts to report annually. In 2024, 10 facilities reported releasing dimethylamine dicamba to EPA's TRI program.
The primary release pathway is air emissions (1.4k lb), which includes both stack emissions from industrial processes and fugitive emissions from equipment leaks, evaporation, and other non-point sources.
TRI data represents reported releases, not measured environmental concentrations. A facility reporting large releases of dimethylamine dicamba is not necessarily causing harm at those levels — toxicity, exposure pathways, and local conditions all matter. Conversely, small reported amounts of highly toxic chemicals can pose greater risk than large amounts of less toxic ones. TRI is a transparency tool, not a risk assessment.
For health information about specific chemicals, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) publishes toxicological profiles, and EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) provides reference doses and cancer classifications.