Which states produce the most pollution? The answer depends on how you measure it — total chemical releases, number of contaminated sites, or enforcement actions — and each tells a different story. A state with massive mining operations may top the release charts while having few Superfund sites, while a densely populated industrial state may have more cleanup sites but lower raw tonnage.
The rankings below use EPA's Toxic Release Inventory (TRI), which tracks annual chemical releases from industrial facilities. TRI captures a specific slice of pollution — chemicals released by facilities above reporting thresholds — not all environmental contamination. States with large mining, chemical manufacturing, or petroleum refining sectors tend to dominate because those industries handle the largest volumes of TRI-listed chemicals.
We also include Superfund site counts and total EPA penalties to give a fuller picture. Superfund sites represent the worst historical contamination — places where cleanup is federally managed. Penalty totals reflect recent enforcement activity, which correlates with both violation severity and EPA regional office priorities.
| # | State | On-site releases (lb) | Superfund sites | Significant violators | Total penalties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alaska | 841.1M | 6 | 200 | $58.6M |
| 2 | Texas | 234.8M | 56 | 784 | $1.0B |
| 3 | Utah | 234.2M | 15 | 21 | $171.0M |
| 4 | Nevada | 152.8M | 2 | 43 | $99.8M |
| 5 | Louisiana | 119.9M | 17 | 2,092 | $172.3M |
| 6 | Arizona | 115.7M | 10 | 92 | $98.6M |
| 7 | Arkansas | 72.2M | 9 | 386 | $105.2M |
| 8 | Indiana | 71.0M | 40 | 321 | $1.9B |
| 9 | Alabama | 67.1M | 13 | 393 | $128.0M |
| 10 | Tennessee | 58.8M | 19 | 89 | $139.4M |
| 11 | Ohio | 52.2M | 41 | 472 | $265.2M |
| 12 | Idaho | 49.4M | 9 | 132 | $109.7M |
| 13 | North Dakota | 48.4M | 0 | 124 | $137.4M |
| 14 | Georgia | 46.2M | 18 | 609 | $183.4M |
| 15 | Mississippi | 45.5M | 9 | 217 | $78.9M |
| 16 | Missouri | 44.1M | 33 | 604 | $116.0M |
| 17 | Montana | 40.8M | 19 | 161 | $60.7M |
| 18 | Florida | 38.9M | 53 | 491 | $242.1M |
| 19 | Michigan | 37.9M | 68 | 390 | $218.3M |
| 20 | New Mexico | 35.3M | 16 | 352 | $1.2B |
| 21 | Illinois | 32.5M | 49 | 726 | $206.5M |
| 22 | North Carolina | 32.4M | 38 | 116 | $220.6M |
| 23 | Oklahoma | 32.2M | 10 | 198 | $97.2M |
| 24 | Kentucky | 28.6M | 10 | 478 | $160.1M |
| 25 | South Carolina | 28.0M | 28 | 98 | $111.0M |
| 26 | Iowa | 26.6M | 14 | 167 | $95.5M |
| 27 | Virginia | 26.6M | 29 | 323 | $128.8M |
| 28 | California | 23.3M | 99 | 374 | $658.7M |
| 29 | Colorado | 22.7M | 21 | 492 | $155.0M |
| 30 | Pennsylvania | 21.6M | 92 | 1,005 | $347.6M |
| 31 | Oregon | 19.0M | 16 | 86 | $86.0M |
| 32 | Kansas | 17.6M | 15 | 110 | $126.4M |
| 33 | Wyoming | 16.8M | 1 | 86 | $66.0M |
| 34 | Minnesota | 15.6M | 25 | 69 | $107.5M |
| 35 | West Virginia | 15.2M | 11 | 1,560 | $73.1M |
| 36 | Nebraska | 14.9M | 18 | 102 | $76.2M |
| 37 | Wisconsin | 12.1M | 37 | 119 | $207.7M |
| 38 | New York | 10.3M | 83 | 478 | $338.9M |
| 39 | Washington | 9.7M | 47 | 1,764 | $159.0M |
| 40 | South Dakota | 6.1M | 2 | 15 | $53.7M |
| 41 | Maine | 5.8M | 10 | 59 | $58.8M |
| 42 | Delaware | 5.0M | 18 | 14 | $18.8M |
| 43 | New Jersey | 4.4M | 115 | 393 | $120.5M |
| 44 | Maryland | 2.4M | 22 | 523 | $117.8M |
| 45 | Hawaii | 2.1M | 3 | 17 | $55.5M |
| 46 | Puerto Rico | 1.8M | 19 | 245 | $20.4M |
| 47 | Massachusetts | 659.7k | 33 | 231 | $83.1M |
| 48 | Connecticut | 490.5k | 13 | 219 | $48.9M |
| 49 | Guam | 235.6k | 2 | 14 | $103.7k |
| 50 | Rhode Island | 224.9k | 12 | 33 | $16.6M |
| 51 | Vermont | 197.9k | 12 | 64 | $33.2M |
| 52 | New Hampshire | 120.0k | 21 | 82 | $43.1M |
| 53 | American Samoa | 56.2k | 0 | 5 | $0 |
| 54 | District of Columbia | 19.9k | 1 | 26 | $974.2k |
| 55 | Northern Mariana Islands | 4.6k | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| 56 | U.S. Virgin Islands | 1.0k | 1 | 41 | $5.5M |
High release totals don't automatically mean worse environmental outcomes. Alaska ranks first largely because of a single copper-zinc mine (Red Dog Mine) that reports hundreds of millions of pounds of on-site releases — mostly mine tailings managed on-site rather than released into surrounding ecosystems. Texas and Utah follow for similar reasons: large-scale mining and petrochemical operations that handle enormous chemical volumes.
States with fewer raw releases may still have serious localized contamination. New Jersey, for example, has more Superfund sites than almost any other state despite moderate TRI totals, reflecting decades of dense industrial activity in a small geographic area.
For a location-specific picture, search by address to see what EPA-tracked facilities are near you.